Chaotic wrote: [View Post]
8) bla bla bla bla
Testing Events Reg
Subject: Re: Testing Events Reg
Yes, thats right :mryellow: And on my site only google use Lo-Fi.
Thats why I would prefer this
1. Registered Users only visible if you are logged in.
2. Message if you are not logged in.
Same on Lo-Fi and on normal version. ;-)
But you are the man MG... you could decide :P
Mighty Gorgon wrote: [View Post]
Yes, thats right :mryellow: And on my site only google use Lo-Fi.
Thats why I would prefer this
1. Registered Users only visible if you are logged in.
2. Message if you are not logged in.
Informpro wrote: [View Post]
Same on Lo-Fi and on normal version. ;-)
But you are the man MG... you could decide :P
Subject: Re: Testing Events Reg
Looks quite cool (even if I'm sure I don't know half of what it can do and how it's done :LOL:
Only max 20 event reg is a bit low IMHO, but maybe this was set by the initial poster
Only max 20 event reg is a bit low IMHO, but maybe this was set by the initial poster
Subject: Re: Testing Events Reg
1.- I Click in "No sure"
2.- I click in "Unregistred"
3.- I click in "Sure" <=== not Work
2.- I click in "Unregistred"
3.- I click in "Sure" <=== not Work
Subject: Re: Testing Events Reg
Sure is Full! :mryellow: it has a maximum of 20 subscribers
Event Reg wrote:
Subject: Re: Testing Events Reg
This button isn't clickable for me either, it has disabled=disabled.
Subject: Re: Testing Events Reg
It's not suposed to work above 20 subscriptions Informpro, 20 users clicked=Full=Disable
Subject:
I found this a very useful feature for people organizing events. The problem is that sometimes, when you organize events, you need a bit of reliability on the data. For example, if you are going to make a reservation at a Restaurant, you need to know exactly the amount of people, and in my opinion, it should not be possible to make click at Sure!, and when the organizer makes the reservation, you change your choice and there is no track of what you did, because organizer will get crazy.
I know there are a lot of ways to found who made the cheat and that organizer can take a lot of cares to prevent this things, but I think that if we provide a tool, the tool should work ok.
Other interesting thing, is that some people like to go to events with this persons who they share there time with. Some people call this second one "girlfriend". So, it would be a nice idea make possible the input of how many persons you want to take with you (your girlfriend and her parents, usually).
this is the code suggested by my cat for this purpose :
as<zaP+'.+''''''''''''''''''+.++++++++++++++'...........SDAFFEFEZEZEZESZ3ª3ª+++++++++++++++++´
I know there are a lot of ways to found who made the cheat and that organizer can take a lot of cares to prevent this things, but I think that if we provide a tool, the tool should work ok.
Other interesting thing, is that some people like to go to events with this persons who they share there time with. Some people call this second one "girlfriend". So, it would be a nice idea make possible the input of how many persons you want to take with you (your girlfriend and her parents, usually).
this is the code suggested by my cat for this purpose :
as<zaP+'.+''''''''''''''''''+.++++++++++++++'...........SDAFFEFEZEZEZESZ3ª3ª+++++++++++++++++´
Page 4 of 4
You cannot post new topicsYou cannot reply to topics
You cannot edit your posts
You cannot delete your posts
You cannot vote in polls
You cannot attach files
You can download files
You cannot post calendar events
This is a "Lo-Fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Powered by Icy Phoenix based on phpBB
Generation Time: 0.2464s (PHP: 8% SQL: 92%)
SQL queries: 24 - Debug Off - GZIP Enabled