Icy Phoenix

hope that they count





missing "Link-to-Us" button
and the "Show Calendar" doesn't show

using Aphrote Text if it matters..

I'm sorry...
I think that's caused by Opera... at least the second one.

it shouldn't be

always worked with other releases..

Well... in my test board does work both in FF and IE... and I also tried it with Safari and Konqueror yesterday.

at least the second one

I repeat 'cause I was wrong before...

hmm just checked with FF and the calendar works..

not the link button thingy though

and with the MG style there ain't no calendar with either FF or Opera

Link Us button is working for me with FF and IE... and I don't have any other browser to test this.

Show Calendar is not presente in MG Themes, because I don't like that function!

Hi all, i'm Gomesh.

Well: i've found 2 probables bugs:

1) If you set a message in Server & Cookies for Disabled Board, and Update, message is present and visible. But if you set other tricks in Various Settings, and update it, the message in Server & Cookies will be erase (Probable sql update in Various Settings modify this value);

2) In "Viewonline" status i see many people in Index Album and some topic link is wrong, because i click on this link, back on forum section of this topic and i not see the user in this section.

P.S. Sorry for me incomprensible English

cYa All.

Gomesh wrote: [View Post]

Hi all, i'm Gomesh.

Well: i've found 2 probables bugs:

1) If you set a message in Server & Cookies for Disabled Board, and Update, message is present and visible. But if you set other tricks in Various Settings, and update it, the message in Server & Cookies will be erase (Probable sql update in Various Settings modify this value);

2) In "Viewonline" status i see many people in Index Album and some topic link is wrong, because i click on this link, back on forum section of this topic and i not see the user in this section.

P.S. Sorry for me incomprensible English

cYa All.

Thanks Gomesh for reporting.

The first bug has been already fixed in the dev release.

The second is due to sessions refresh... remembers that sessions are refreshed every 300 seconds (five minutes)... so they could be not updated. You can decrease the refresh time by editing sessions.php, but then you should charge your server with additional SQL...

Ti rispondo al volo in Italiano: avevo pensato fosse un problema di timelimit, ma i lproblema reale è questo: il link al topic riporta giustamente Forum (Sezione) >> Titolo del Topic (Link).

Praticamente la sezione è giusta mentre il Link è errato. Sono andato a vedere la tabella relativa e, praticamente, viene assegnato al topic_session un valore uguale al numero di user_id dell'utente.

Quindi: se clikko direttamente su quel link mi porta al messaggio corrispondente all'user_id dell'utente che in quel momento lo sta visualizzando. Se da quella posizione clicco sul Forum (La sezione, per intenderci) l'untente non è presente. Allora per vedere realmente dove sta l'utente devo andare nuovamente su Viewonline e, invece di cliccare sul titolo del messaggio che l'utente sta visualizzando devo cliccare, invece, sul Forum. In questo modo trovo l'utente presente in quel Forum. Ho provato a togliere il tuo Add-on relativo al session_topic (Per intenderci la semplice visualizzazione classica di phpbb che ti dice la sezione dove si trova l'utente) e funziona.

------------------

In first time i've change this limit of time refresh for SQL, but the problem is the same. The link visible in Viewonline in Forum >> Title of Topic (Link). Well: the Section of Forum is correct, but the title is wrong. I've see the relative table of SQL and i've see one inconsistence (Probable in my SQL's Tables): the session_topic value report the same number of user_id who see the topic.

cYa All.

Others minor Bugs:

1) When you click on [View Message] in a Quote or in #number of reply (Vbulletin tipe, bottom avatar), if the author have a gif or jpeg signature, this's wrote in [_img_]http://www.address_image.xxx[_/img_] (Without Underscore) and isn't visible;

2) When u quote > quote > quote > quote message, the latest quote is reported in [quote=message . . . ] and isn't really quoted. Es.:

Gomesh wrote: [View Post]

Gomesh wrote: [View Post]

Gomesh wrote: [View Post]

[quote user="Gomesh" post="10831"]
1st Quote

[/quote]
2nd Quote

3th Quote

4th Quote

P.S. Per la versione BetaTester bastano questi Bugs

I think that the #1 was reported at xs.com weeks ago

Yes, it was...

Gomesh wrote: [View Post]

In first time i've change this limit of time refresh for SQL, but the problem is the same. The link visible in Viewonline in Forum >> Title of Topic (Link). Well: the Section of Forum is correct, but the title is wrong. I've see the relative table of SQL and i've see one inconsistence (Probable in my SQL's Tables): the session_topic value report the same number of user_id who see the topic.

I'll check this again... Thanks.

Gomesh wrote: [View Post]

1) When you click on [View Message] in a Quote or in #number of reply (Vbulletin tipe, bottom avatar), if the author have a gif or jpeg signature, this's wrote in [_img_]http://www.address_image.xxx[_/img_] (Without Underscore) and isn't visible;

It's not a bug... the bug was in viewtopic... because IMG should be disabled in signatures by default...

Anyway this should have been fixed in 058.

Gomesh wrote: [View Post]

2) When u quote > quote > quote > quote message, the latest quote is reported in [quote=message . . . ] and isn't really quoted.

It's not a bug... you have an option in ACP for limiting nested quotes.

Gomesh, viewonline section is working fine here... just tested!

Mighty Gorgon wrote: [View Post]

Link Us button is working for me with FF and IE... and I don't have any other browser to test this.

you should just make that html valid at least it'll work with alot more browsers then
or at least it should work then..

Mighty Gorgon wrote: [View Post]

Show Calendar is not presente in MG Themes, because I don't like that function!

yeah me neither
can't you just disable that in the ACP or something?

Code validation might be a task for the next release... so would the calendar switch.

Tom wrote: [View Post]

Code validation might be a task for the next release... so would the calendar switch.

I might be able to help with that validation thingy..

Tom wrote: [View Post]

Code validation might be a task for the next release... so would the calendar switch.

Yes, I confrim this... development phase is OFF for this release... only bug fixing...

Nizzle wrote: [View Post]

I might be able to help with that validation thingy..

Of course you may help. When next release is out, we can split the template files to fix all W3C incompatibilities.

that's ALOT of work..
not really all that hard to do though..

Making the code more W3C compliant is alot of work, because not all HTML is in the template. Alot of links are generated within PHP files. The hard work will be to find all the non valid (X)HTML tags.
Also CSS will be alot of work...

CSS will be my task... too many things and files are linked to CSS... this will require class after class inspection for every template file...

If you get bored during your vacation, you'll have something to do... LOL!

Tom wrote: [View Post]

If you get bored during your vacation, you'll have something to do... LOL!

I don't think it will be the case... but thanks for the suggestion!

Tom wrote: [View Post]

Making the code more W3C compliant is alot of work, because not all HTML is in the template. Alot of links are generated within PHP files. The hard work will be to find all the non valid (X)HTML tags.
Also CSS will be alot of work...

I think not a single template is valid

Nizzle wrote: [View Post]

I think not a single template is valid

Thankfully browsers are forgiving...

if they weren't internet would suck badly

loads of pages are invalid

Or: If they weren't more pages would be vaild.

Most of not valid tags are just warning... so we can live with them without problems!

Anyway, most of problems are in CSS and in header... fixing those will results in more valid pages...

fully valid Xhtml 1.1 ownage

that'll be cool